Barron’s 100 Most Sustainable Companies: The Methodology

Textual content dimension

Calvert Analysis & Administration, a high sustainable investing store, analyzed the 1,000 largest U.S. publicly held corporations, measured by market capitalization. It rated each company on 5 key stakeholder classes: shareholders, staff, clients, group, and planet.

To calculate the scores, Calvert thought of greater than 230 key efficiency indicators from six main distributors—CDP (previously generally known as the Carbon Disclosure Venture), ISS, MSCI, Sustainalytics, Refinitiv’s Asset4, and TruValue Labs—and supplemented by different knowledge sources, the place related.

This knowledge was organized into 28 distinct subjects, similar to greenhouse fuel emissions, office security, and office variety. (See particulars within the desk beneath). These 28 distinct subjects had been sorted into the 5 key stakeholder classes. Every firm obtained a ranking of 0-100 in every stakeholder class, based mostly on Calvert’s proprietary evaluation and scoring methodology, which included taking a median of indicator-level scores over two years.

Subsequent, an total ranking for every firm was calculated utilizing a weighted common of the 5 key stakeholder classes. The weightings had been based mostly on Calvert’s evaluation of the monetary materiality of every stakeholder class inside every firm’s trade peer group. Calvert decided a singular weight for every class in every of greater than 200 distinct trade peer teams.

As well as, to be thought of among the many 100 Most Sustainable Companies, a agency wanted to be rated above the underside quartile in all financially materials stakeholder classes. In different phrases, an organization’s poor efficiency with any key stakeholder group decided to be financially materials disqualified that firm from consideration.