[ad_1]
Dermot Gallagher returns with the most recent Ref Watch and the previous Premier League referee thinks there was nothing fallacious with West Brom’s opening objective in opposition to Manchester United.
West Brom 1-1 Man Utd
INCIDENT: Mbaye Diagne nodded West Brom forward early on on the Hawthorns, however Man Utd thought the objective ought to have been dominated out for a foul by the Baggies striker on defender Victor Lindelof.
VERDICT: Right determination.
DERMOT SAYS: It’s a good objective, the ahead is powerful, he doesn’t do something fallacious for me, he will get throughout the defender and heads the ball cleanly and it’s good ahead’s play.
Southampton 1-2 Wolves
INCIDENT: Wolves have been awarded a penalty after Ryan Bertrand was deemed to have dealt with Nelson Semedo’s shot contained in the field.
VERDICT: Mistaken determination.
DERMOT SAYS: It’s all about place to begin and consistency and three weeks in the past we had the same incident with [George] Baldock in opposition to Man Metropolis. It’s nearly carbon copy, the ball comes at him very quick, Bertrand is popping away, his arm is up and outstretched, however it’s tight sufficient to his physique and he was very, very unfortunate. If the referee [Graham Scott] had simply performed on, there wouldn’t have been an excessive amount of fuss about it.
Arsenal 4-2 Leeds
INCIDENT: Liam Cooper is initially penalised for bringing down Bukayo Saka, just for the referee to overturn his determination on evaluate.
VERDICT: Right determination.
DERMOT SAYS: If you’re a defender making a problem like this, you’d be very assured the VAR would see that you simply truly didn’t commit a foul. There’s minimal contact and he goes down very simply and fairly rightly the VAR in Andre Marriner tells Stuart Attwell to go and take a look and when Stuart sees it from behind the objective, there may be your reply – no penalty.
Leicester 3-1 Liverpool
INCIDENT: Leicester are awarded a free kick and never a penalty after Harvey Barnes is tripped by Thiago Alcantara on the sting of the world.
VERDICT: Right determination.
DERMOT SAYS: It’s attention-grabbing as earlier within the season we had this notion – [Ezgjan] Alioski was the primary one – that in the event that they break the road, then they will give a penalty. And we noticed that additionally with at Wolves vs West Brom. Then we had a change of thought course of at Leicester vs Everton after which a number of weeks in the past with [Edinson] Cavani at Man Utd vs Southampton, it was deemed that they are going to give the foul the place the offence truly occurred, regardless of the place the participant’s physique was.
In the event you have a look at this, Barnes is simply outdoors the penalty space the place the contact is made and that’s the place they get the foul and I truly like that as I all the time thought it was very, very harsh to present a penalty for one thing that truly occurred simply outdoors the penalty space, regardless of the place his physique was.
So I absolutely anticipated after the final couple of incidents at, say, Leicester and Man Utd that this is able to be given outdoors the field.
Man City 3-0 Tottenham
INCIDENT: Man Metropolis are awarded a penalty when Ilkay Gundogan goes over within the field below a problem from Pierre-Emile Hojbjerg.
VERDICT: Right determination.
DERMOT SAYS: That is going to separate individuals doubtless. There is no such thing as a doubt in my thoughts that Gundogan makes contact with Hojbjerg, however what I’d say is, how a lot contact has he made? It’s a contact sport and due to Paul Tierney’s place, he has bought the very best view and due to the empty stands, he may hear the quantity of contact made, whether or not it’s only a look down or is it into the leg.
So I’d all the time again the referee with this as he has the very best view and he is aware of the contact what it’s. So I’d go along with the referee and penalty.
[ad_2]
Source link